Have you heard of “the global goals”? If you haven’t heard of them by now, rest assured that you will be hearing plenty about them in the days ahead. On September 25th, the United Nations launched a set of 17 ambitious goals that it plans…
The full report from David Rockefeller’s Trilateral Commission 2012 North American Regional Meeting on the Trans Pacific Partnership is here.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation elaborates on the Trans Pacific Partnership, commonly known as TPP;
The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is a secretive, multinational trade agreement that threatens to extend restrictive intellectual property (IP) laws across the globe and rewrite international rules on its enforcement. The main problems are two-fold:
(1) Intellectual Property Chapter: Leaked draft texts of the agreement show that the IP chapter would have extensive negative ramifications for users’ freedom of speech, right to privacy and due process, and hinder peoples’ abilities to innovate.
(2) Lack of Transparency: The entire process has shut out multi-stakeholder participation and is shrouded in secrecy.
Party politics have imploded over free trade. Senate Democrats denied giving Obama fast-track authority to pass the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), a free-trade deal involving 40% of the world’s economy. Republicans meanwhile came to their president’s rescue. And pigs flew. Francesca breaks down the congressional drama that has CSPAN looking like a telenovela.
Ellen Brown, author of Web of Debt, in her article in Huffington Post describes the TPP as “blatantly unconstitutional”;
The TPP would destroy our republican form of government under the rule of law, by elevating the rights of investors — also called the rights of “capital” — above the rights of the citizens.
(Mention of the TPP begins around the 6:00 min mark.)
GOP presidential candidate Carly Fiorina does not agree with other Republicans on their support for the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) because she opposes China’s eventual membership in the TPP;
Additional articles on this topic can be found here:
The Senator raises the question of whether China could be admitted to membership in the TPP without future congressional approval;
The TPP is actually the first step to including China and Russia along with the United States in an Asia-Pacific trade merger. – The New American
The geopolitical importance of the Trans-Pacific Partnership: At stake, a liberal economic order – Brookings Institute
Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Countries: Comparative Trade and Economic Analysis
Senator Bernie Sanders: The Trans Pacific Trade Agreement Must Be Defeated
David Rockefeller is behind the #TPP
— #TechnocracyRising (@TwistedPolitix) May 19, 2015
By Joan Veon
August 13, 2004
It has been ten years since I have been writing and studying the now established environmental philosophy of sustainable development. I was first confronted with it at the United Nations Conference on Population and Development-UNCED in Cairo, Egypt in 1994. Sustainable development was a core philosophy behind the Programme of Action called “Agenda 21” at the 1992 United Nations Conference on the Environment and Development-UNCED, now dubbed the “Rio Earth Summit.”
In Rio, conference Secretary-General Maurice Strong stated,
Agenda 21 – still stands as the most comprehensive, most far-reaching and, if implemented, the most effective programme of international action ever sanctioned by the international community. It is not a final and complete action programme, but one which must continue to evolve.
Sustainable development has continued to evolve as that of protecting the world’s resources while its true agenda is to control the world’s resources. Communism also has control at its core and it also is evolving. I remember asking former UN Secretary-General Boutros-Boutros Ghali what he meant by “change” and he told me that he was introducing “constant change” as a way to continue the evolutionary processes begun in Rio.
Under the evolutionary process which Agenda 21 set in motion, sustainable development has become like a prism. Every time you turn it, you get a different “color.” The sustainable development prism includes the social, political, economic and environmental factors. Until Rio, the phrase sustainable development had not appeared in any prior UN documents, papers or reference books.
It should be noted that Agenda 21 sets up the global infrastructure needed to manage, count, and control all of the world’s assets. Included are the forests, fresh water, agricultural lands, deserts, pastures, rangelands, farmers’ fields, oceans and inland waterways, marine environment, marine life, cities, housing, sewer and solid wastes, methods of production, air, pollution, biotechnology-every aspect of living-farming, production and manufacturing, research and medicine, etc., along with you and I. Today everything is sustainable: sustainable water, sustainable forests, sustainable markets, sustainable agriculture, etc.
Through advanced technology such as the Geographic Information System (GIS), the control, count and management of the earth’s assets is being implemented. Scientists have told me that the GIS satellites can measure the quality of soil anywhere in the earth to a depth of three inches. Furthermore, it can tell you what kind of birds and insects are in which kind of tree. It can also see you and me sleeping in our beds and living in our houses-ever wonder why leaded paint was such a problem? The UN calls this transparency while you and I call it invasion of privacy.
So how did the UN come up with this heinous agenda? It began in 1972 when the first Earth Summit was held in Stockholm, Sweden. Maurice Strong was the conference Secretary-General of that meeting also. As a result of its deliberations, in 1974 the UN General Assembly set up the UN Environment Program-UNEP, now a major player in sustainable development, interacting with corporations and a key partner in the United Nations Global Compact.
It should be noted that hundreds, if not thousands of environmental NGO’s support and are helping to implement Agenda 21 worldwide. The United Nations has given them vast responsibilities to assist in the implementation of sustainable development. Furthermore, governments are recognizing their manpower as a free source of power to carry the message throughout the world. Two very powerful NGO’s that were part of the birthing of sustainable development are the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) and the World Wildlife Fund (WWF). In the fall of 1983, the 38th Session of the United Nations General Assembly passed Resolution 38/161, which called upon the secretary-general to appoint a commission “to propose long-term environmental strategies for achieving sustainable development to the year 2000 and beyond.”
The individuals chosen for that commission included Gro Harlem Brundtland, former prime minister of Norway and vice-president of the Socialist International who just retired as Director-General of the World Health Organization. It was William Ruckleshaus from the U.S. who also served on this life-changing commission. The rest of the delegates were from other socialist, Marxist, or communist countries. While I could provide you with their definition of sustainable development which my research shows is based on the 1977 USSR constitution, let me paraphrase:
The world has too many people, and if we do not reduce the number of people on planet Earth, they will use up all of the Earth’s resources so that future generations will be left without any resources. The United Nations is the best global body to monitor, manage and preserve the resources of the planet.
As a community activist ten years ago, I could not understand why our kids were being pushed to use condoms, why the schools were educating in matters that did not involve them, why family planning classes were discussing sensitive matters in front of boys and girls or why homosexuality was becoming accepted (homosexuals don’t procreate-now they only adopt). Furthermore, the schools were assisting abortion clinics by aiding pregnant girls during school hours by providing school time for them to use their facilities, without parental consent. These are all methods to reduce the population. Euthanasia, the right to die with dignity, is for the elderly. Then there are wars, illnesses, and viruses. It should be noted that these same environmentalists feel that the population of the world has to be reduced by at least 66% in order for the earth to be sustainable. However, the brilliant research of Dr. Jacqueline Kasun from Hamboldt University has proven statistically that if you were to take all of the people in the world and put them into the State of Texas, they would have 1200 square feet of space each.
Even before the people of the world understood the threat to world population, the Group of Seven, now the Group of Eight world leaders stated in their 1981 communique that they were “deeply concerned about the implication of world population growth.” In 1990, they commended the forthcoming 1992 Rio Earth Summit and in 1992, they wrote, “The Earth Summit has been a landmark in heightening the consciousness of the global environmental challenges and in creating a world-wide partnership on development and the environment.”
It was at the 1992 UNCED conference that sustainable development was unveiled. Interestingly to note, there was a very strong and powerful corporate lobby that had come together to support this evil agenda of control. Called the World Business Council for Sustainable Development-WBCSD, they still exert great power and influence on the international level. The WBCSD has nurtured and expanded sustainable development-all the way to the ten year follow-up of UNCED in 2004 at the World Summit for Sustainable Development in Johannesburg.
In Johannesburg, sustainable development evolved to a much higher level. There many of the same people who were involved ten years previous were present, along with some new players which included Congressman Dennis Kuchinich and others, along with former governor of California Jerry Brown. The Bush Administration put forth a World Summit Vision Statement that said in part
We believe sustainable development begins at home and is supported by effective domestic policies and international partnerships. We recognize poverty remains a global problem of huge proportions that demands our action.
To fulfill its commitment, our government is spending $970 million over three years which will be used to leverage private monies to generate more than $1.6B for water-related and other activities globally. Projects included: Clean Energy, an Initiative to Cut Hunger, sustainable forest management and monies to help fight AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria.
The centerpiece of Johannesburg was the launching of “International Sustainable Development Law” that will govern the implementation and legal rights of sustainable development. This new discipline is based on poverty alleviation and the rights of the marginalized (socialistic transfer of wealth mechanisms). Over 150 environmental lawyers and those from other related disciplines met in Durban, South Africa a week before to discuss the integration of environmental, economic, and social laws into one new discipline. There were policy papers put forth which they hoped would be used as the framework for a Treaty on International Sustainable Development Law. Their actions reaffirmed Chapter 39 of Agenda 21 which recognizes the need to continue progressive development and codification of international law related to sustainable development. It should be noted that these laws will be incorporated into every local and national level of law worldwide.
For those of us with Christian values, this is the anti-thesis of what we believe for sustainable development is pagan. It perverts Genesis 1, 2, and 3 in that it puts the earth as being dominant over man and not man as having dominance over the earth-hence, you and I have no value since we have been demoted to the same value as an animal or plant. So what do you think is the end result of international sustainable development law? Enslavement.
Now who were THE players behind the birthing of sustainable development? To my surprise, it was Prince Charles. Not happy with the Christian faith, Charles turned to “para- psychology” which some define as “dabbling in the occult.” He was greatly influenced by the South African-born writer, explorer, and mystic Laurens van der Post who was a friend of his grandmother, the Queen Mother. The prince was also influenced by James Lovelock, a British scientist who formulated the “Gaia hypothesis, which today is known as the worship of the earth, a belief based on the Greek goddess Gaia, the Earth Mother. Charles concurs with the perversion of Genesis 1, 2, and 3.
Most people will not find Prince Charles or his environmental activities in the headlines of major newspapers. Nor do his biographies really explain his involvement, as there is basically a blackout on what he is really doing worldwide. In April 1991, fourteen months before UNCED, the Prince held a private two day international conference aboard the royal yacht Britannia, moored off the coast of Brazil. His goal was to bring together key international figures in an attempt to achieve a degree of harmony between the various countries that would happen at the Rio Earth Summit. Then Senator Al Gore was present, along with senior officials from the World Bank, chief executives from companies such as Shell and British Petroleum, the key NGO’s, and other officials.
Several years ago, I had the opportunity to interview Maurice Strong and specifically asked him about this meeting. He told me he was in London at a World Wildlife meeting hosted by Prince Philip and was asked by Prince Charles to accompany him to Rio for the April 1991 meeting. Furthermore, in 1990 when sustainable development had just been formulated by the Brundtland Commission, it was the prince who commended them for “bringing the term ‘sustainable development’ into everyone’s vocabulary.”
As sustainable development has evolved to the point where the teaching of Agenda 21 is called “Earth Sciences” in schools, universities, and colleges, our government has instituted Agenda 21 through the Presidents Commission on Sustainable Development. Throughout the U.S., there are cities that have adopted Agenda 21 and there are those that are now sustainable, such as “Sustainable Racine.” We must remember Russia did not fall to the communists all at once-it was city by city.
I wrote Prince Charles the Sustainable Prince in 1997 with major updates in 1998 and 2000. It is key and relevant for those who want to understand what is happening today. At every turn the Prince is still involved in the affairs of the United Nations, sustainable development, and public-private partnership. The Prince’s representatives are to be found at all the key global meetings, expounding and advancing this life changing philosophy. Perhaps we should wonder why the world still follows him and carries out his dictates.
For ten years, various activists have been warning and educating about sustainable development. Who do we go to? The church has been silent. Major “conservatives” have been silent. No one has even questioned President Bush about his support for sustainable development. It is not even a key issue in this election.
© 2004 Joan Veon – All Rights Reserved
Order Joan Veon’s book;
“The United Nations’
Joan Veon (RIP) was a businesswoman and international reporter, having covered 64 Global meetings around the world in the last ten years. Please visit her website: www.womensgroup.org.
1972 United Nations Conference on the Human Environment (Part 1)
Uploaded on May 13, 2009
In June of 1972, leaders and bureaucrats from around the world met in Stockholm, Sweden, for the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, which marked the globalization of the Rockefeller-funded environmental movement. One of the leading names behind the conference, who was the Secretary-General of the event, is Canadian businessman and globalist new ager Maurice Strong, who is considered to be the father of the global environmental movement and today is very much behind the inner workings of the corporate-sponsored, foundation-funded “Green” movement, which is leading the push towards increasing wealth redistribution from the West to the East and third world nations, global taxation and regulation, more international law, the evisceration of national sovereignty, the elimination of property rights, more government control (ie. the elimination of basic freedoms), and eventually global communism under a totalitarian New World Order.
In this video you will see, along with the aforementioned Strong, people like former SS officer and then UN Secretary-General Kurt Waldheim, addressing the conference calling for “global solutions” to this “global problem,” as well as names such as population reduction advocate Paul Ehrlich (author of ‘The Population Bomb’) and then World Bank President, Robert McNamera.
Speaking of Agenda 21 | Dr. Stanley Monteith & Michael Shaw
Michael Shaw of Freedom 21 Santa Cruz and Dr. Stanley Monteith of Radio Liberty explain the United Nations’ Agenda 21. Filmed at the 2006 Eagle Forum Conference in Santa Rosa, California.
Links to informative news articles exposing Agenda 21 and the drive for a UN-administered “global green regime” (i.e. socialist world government):
Your Hometown & the United Nations’ Agenda 21
Businesses – and their jobs – are fleeing California at breakneck speed because of costly, even abusive, regulations meant to adhere to UN standards. Is your state next?
Eco-Agenda for Planetary Control
The Earth Summit’s Agenda 21 and other radical proposals — supposedly intended to save “Mother Earth” — will bring untold human suffering and ecological damage.
The UN Attack on Property
Ownership of the fruits of one’s labor is essential to liberty. By its efforts to abolish the right to private property, the UN has shown that it cares nothing for individual freedom.
The United Nations’ Big Green Machine
Agenda 21: Conspiracy Theory or Threat?
EPA’s Plans for Implementing UN’s Agenda 21
What are the UN’s Agenda 21 and ICLEI?
Agenda 21: The U.N. Plan for Your “Sustainable” Community
Habitat II: The UN Plan For Human Settlements
UN Bosses Secretly Plot Global Govt Through “Green Economy” for Rio+20
UN Ready to Lead Environmental World Government
UN’s Green Economy May Cost $2.5 Trillion a Year
UN’s Environmental “Solution”: More Government
Science Group: UN Rio+20 Summit Must Reduce Global Population
UN Pushes Population Control Agenda
Global Green Regime: The Biodiversity Treaty
Sink the Law of the Sea Treaty!
Reheating the “Global Warming” Myth
IPCC Researchers Admit Global Warming Fraud
From Rio to Copenhagen: The Earth Summit’s Legacy
Socialist International in Copenhagen: “Birth of Global Governance”
Hijacking “Spaceship Earth”
Maurice Strong: The Most Dangerous Man In The World
The New World Religion
Presented to the world as a mystical revelation, the UN Earth Charter is actually a diabolical blueprint for global government.
The Environmental Agenda
Al Gore’s Vision of Global Salvation
The UN Is NOT Your Friend
Behind the mask of peace, brotherhood, and universal understanding, the United Nations promotes terror and tyranny in order to achieve its real objective: world government.
Tendrils of Tyranny
Science, Politics and Death
Environmental extremism kills. Millions die annually because of restrictions on DDT, and imposing the “Kyoto” regulations would kill many more.
UN Attack on World Population
To UN family planners, human life is not sacred but is a plague afflicting “Mother Earth” that needs to be cured by coercive population control programs.
A Covenant With Death
The Fruits of Eco-Extremism
ECO ’92: Launching Pad for International Global Governance
Socializing at Rio: Socialists Run the Earth Summit
Private Land Lockup
The Road to Eco-Serfdom
The “Re-Wilded” West
Eco-Socialist Shell Game
High and Dry in the Klamath Basin
Saving Fish Before Firefighters
Eco-feudalism in the Adirondacks
People and Predation
Behind the Environmental Lobby
It may seem stranger than fiction, but it’s a documentable fact: the eco-socialist movement is financed by the super-rich as part of a comprehensive agenda for global control.
The evidence is in that free-market principles and private ownership of natural resources provide better stewardship of the environment than government controls ever could.
Published on Apr 16, 2012
Share this Video on Facebook and Subscribe to Her Channel
Ariel Sharon: “We, the Jewish People, Control America, and The Americans Know it”!
Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA) advisory board includes such notable figures as Michael Ledeen, Richard Perle, and R. James Woolsey, while Vice President Dick Cheney, former U.S. Representative to the United Nations John Bolton, and former Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Douglas Feith were all on JINSA’s Board of Advisors before they entered the Bush administration.
Jason Vest, writing in The Nation,alleges that JINSA, along with Frank Gaffney’s Center for Security Policy, are “underwritten by far-right American Zionists” and both believe strongly that “‘regime change’ by any means necessary in Iraq, Iran, Syria, Saudi Arabia and the Palestinian Authority is an urgent imperative.”
Note the mention of the Israeli think tank document A Strategy for Israel in the 1980’s World Zionist Organization – #DivideAndConquer that was related by the contents and architects as the PNAC Project for a New American Century document that Jeb Bush signed off on. That right there is evidence that foreign agents have subverted the White House and the Bush Administration. Knowledge of this plan should be considered treason in the United States of America.
A Strategy for Israel in the 1980’s World Zionist Organization – #DivideAndConquer
Note the mention of “The Clean Break” by Israeli Richard Perle and recall that he was also a signatory of the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) document that called for a “new pearl harbor” to catalyze support for a greater war in the middle east.
Israel’s influence over American foreign and domestic policy is enormous and dangerous. Only the British Empire, the Crown Corporation, and the Queen of England can exert such influence over the United States, but that is a another story and another video.